Divorce by email
India's Supreme Court is currently considering the Muslim practice of instant divorce. The family law allows Muslim men to end their marriages by simply repeating the word "talaq" (Arabic for divorce) three times. But there is growing opposition to the practice. Ronald Meinardus reports from New Delhi.
The citizens of India have been in conflict for decades – and especially since the nation's independence in the year 1947 – over the constitutionality of Islam′s archaic divorce law and its highly illiberal practice. The government in New Delhi now hopes that a Supreme Court decision will finally lay the long-standing dispute to rest.
Commentaries on the talaq issue are again filling the opinion pages of Indian daily newspapers; on television talk shows supporters and opponents wage vociferous verbal warfare. The question as to which divorce law should apply to India's Muslims is much more than a legal dispute. It is about the precarious relationship between the country′s Hindu majority and its Muslim minority, yet first and foremost – and above all else – about the fundamental question: how secular is India?
India is home to 180 million Muslims. Indonesia is the only nation with a larger Muslim population. These people are subject to their own Islamic personal law – a situation attributable to the country's colonial legacy. This tradition has not been touched by any government, regardless of ideological hue. Even when the nation attained independence, the status quo was preserved. This means that for India's Muslims, Sharia law applies to marriage, divorce, adoption and succession.
Islamic legal scholars, who continue to exert a strong influence on certain sections of this minority population group, say that the talaq divorce is covered by Islamic law. Meanwhile many column inches are devoted to reports on Muslim women whose marriages have been dissolved through talaq; sometimes these "instant divorces" – readers learn – may occur electronically via email and more recently, even via text message or WhatsApp.
In this legal conflict, the battle fronts are unyielding and clearly defined: "talaq is a question of faith for the Muslims, a practice that's 1,400 years old. It's beyond the remit of the court to rule on it," says a representative of the "All Indian Muslim Personal Law Board" (AIMPLB). Behind this rather clunky name is an association founded in 1973 with the primary aim of defending the Islamic Personal Law for Muslims in India. Conservative Muslims support the association, but its reception among liberal-minded members of the minority is rather more lukewarm.
The government's line of argument is diametrically opposed. "Talaq is not an integral part of religion," says Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, who then makes reference to the legal practice in a series of Muslim-majority nations, for example Pakistan, Bangladesh, Egypt and Morocco. There, Islam is the national religion, but family law prohibits "instant divorce", he says. In addition, the practice of talaq violates the principle of equality. It discriminates against the women concerned – both with regard to their position within their marriages, as well as with regard to the majority of Indian women who are not affected by the archaic practice.
The divorce law debate does indeed only affect a comparatively small group of people. In a report for The Hindu newspaper, the General Secretary of the "Islamic Forum", A. Faizur Rahman, quotes data from the 2011 national census: according to these, of India's 84 million female Muslims, "only" 212,000 are divorced. This represents a share of 0.25 percent. There is no record as to how many of these marriages were brought to an end in accordance with the Sharia procedure.
Experts agree that tolerance of the talaq practice is first and foremost the result of a lack of education. They substantiate the theory by observing that "instant divorce" is more common in rural regions than in the comparatively modern urban centres of India.
The government has now announced that it will approve a divorce law for Muslims if the Supreme Court declares the practice of talaq unconstitutional. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who has so far maintained a highly noticeable silence in the current debate, could in this way score political points with liberal Indians of all confessions.
Critics say the secular zeal of the Hindu nationalist BJP government over this issue is out of synch with the religious flavour of its agenda in other questions: they are thinking first and foremost here of the BJP's "cow policy": policies focused on the protection of the cow, an animal considered holy by Hindus, have led to the imposition of beef bans in federal states governed by the party. This is popular with devout Hindus, but disregards the interests (and the traditions) of religious minorities. For a while now people have been talking about a process of "majorisation", which sees Muslims suffer more than most.
Whatever the outcome of the divorce law dispute: the debate over the role of religion in politics and legislation and the rights of religious minorities in the world's largest democracy is unlikely to fall silent.
This article was originally published here.